linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: add runtime PM to set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150831142508.GN12027@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:25:08 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Cc:	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: add runtime PM to set_cs()

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:46:46AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:44:45AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:

> > > The patch is currently sitting in linux-next.

> > > Not sure why it wasn't merged with 4.2.0-rc8.

> > You didn't indicate that it was a bug fix for Linus rather than a fix
> > for recent development :(

Ah, actually it did get applied as a fix - it's just that I didn't send
a pull request before v4.3 got released.  Looking at what's there I
wasn't comfortable with the volume of fixes that arrived and never got
round to picking out those that were most urgent.  Sorry, these things
do happen from time to time I'm afraid especially when I'm travelling,
if something is urgent it's good to verify around -rc6 or so.

> Sorry, I did not know that it was my responsibility.

> How do I indicate this for future reference?

> The patch that Sebastian sent said the following:

> "
> Michael also tested the patch, but have not explicitly written an
> Tested-By, so you may want to wait for feedback from him. The patch
> should be sent for 4.2-rc, which introduced the regression.
> "

That's not in the changelog which is all I have after the patch is
applied (and what I was looking at since I just pulled the commit up by
ID).  If something is in Linus' tree it's often helpful to say
"...introduced in v4.2-rc1" or similar in the changelog.  Though in this
case it wasn't the issue.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)