[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150831152304.GE17812@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:23:04 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Andreas Grünbacher
<andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API Mailing List <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 10/40] richacl: Permission check algorithm
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:06:22AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * We don't care which class the process is in when the acl is
> >> + * not masked.
> >> + */
> >> + in_owner_or_group_class = 1;
> >
> > So why bother setting it at all, then? Oh, I see, it lets you break out
> > of the loop below earlier. OK.
>
> Comment changed to:
>
> /*
> * When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if
> * the process is in the group class and we can earlier break
> * out of the loop below.
> */
makes sense, just replace "earlier break out" by "break out earlier".
>
> > Patch makes sense to me, ACK.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists