[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150831180142.GB81844@google.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:01:42 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC / BUG] mtd: provide proper 32/64-bit compat_ioctl() support
for BLKPG
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:12:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> The same bug applies to block/ioctl.c
Actually I'll correct myself: it looks like block/ already has OK
compat_ioctl support for this. Block devices do a copy to/from user
space to marshal a new struct. Personally, I find my approach a little
clearer.
> But then: which tree should it go in?
I guess since this is only an MTD bug, then it'd be fair to take via
MTD. I'll plan to do that eventually if there are no objections.
> Tested only on MTD, with an ARM32 user space on an ARM64 kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/uapi/linux/blkpg.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
I also suspect it might make more sense to move the compat definitions
to a new non-UAPI include/linux/blkpg.h. I'll probably put that in v2.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists