lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E4A066.5070404@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:43:50 +0300
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc:	jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
	pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix cross compiling error

On 31/08/2015 5:20 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:41PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> Cross compiling perf to other platform failed due to missing symbol:
>
> Adrian, I think this one covers what you would resend, no? If it does,
> can I have your Acked-by?

There was another chunk as well so I sent V2 of the other patch.

>
> - Arnaldo
>
>>    ...
>>    AR       /pathofperf/libperf.a
>>    LD       /pathofperf/tests/perf-in.o
>>    LD       /pathofperf/perf-in.o
>>    LINK     /pathofperf/perf
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_branch_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:899: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_transaction_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:992: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:943: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>>    ...
>>
>> This is because we allow newly introduced intel-pt-decoder to be
>> compiled to not only X86, but tsc.c which required by it is compiled
>> for x86 only.
>>
>> This patch fix the compiling error by allow tsc.c to be compiled if
>> CONFIG_AUXTRACE is set, no matter the target platform.
>>
>> Comment from Arnaldo:
>>
>> There were some changes in this area, i.e. x86 needs tsc, and auxtrace
>> as well, so both should express that via:
>>
>>   libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
>>   libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o
>>
>> Because on !x86 we want to process perf.data files containing Intel PT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
>> index fd2f084..e712311 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
>> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ libperf-y += record.o
>>   libperf-y += srcline.o
>>   libperf-y += data.o
>>   libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
>> +libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o
>>   libperf-y += cloexec.o
>>   libperf-y += thread-stack.o
>>   libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += auxtrace.o
>> --
>> 1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ