linux-kernel - Re: Why is irq_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:01:34 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Why is irq_stack_union a union?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> Why not just a struct? Also, why is this all tangled up in gsbase initialization?
>
> It has to do with the fact that the GCC stackprotector is hardcoded to
> look for the canary at %gs:40.  Since we also use %gs for the percpu
> segment, we have to make sure that the canary is placed at the start
> of the percpu section.  Overlaying it onto the bottom of the IRQ stack
> and was the most convenient way to do it, with a side benefit that
> overflowing the stack will trip the canary.

Would a struct not make more sense, then?

--Andy

>
> --
> Brian Gerst



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/