[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150831074353.GA22039@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:43:53 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Raphaƫl Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf tools: Move tracing_path stuff under same
namespace
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:06:50PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug, at 05:06:37PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > no problem with moving it over to the lib
> >
> > how about having api/fs/tpfs
> > or eventsfs
> > or tracingfs
> >
> >
> > doing the same as tracing_path* stuff ATM
>
> But we're talking about tracing path components here right and not a
> file system? It'd make more sense to me to have this logically above
> the file system layers.
right, on the other side it's fs related.. just holder
for preffered place to read tracepoints from
I dont have strong opinion on where to place it,
but I dont see better place.. fs/tracing_path.c ?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists