[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150901070608.GA5482@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:06:08 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax, pmem: add support for msync
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:38:03AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:59:44PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > For DAX msync we just need to flush the given range using
> > wb_cache_pmem(), which is now a public part of the PMEM API.
>
> This is wrong, because it still leaves fsync() broken on dax.
>
> Flushing dirty data to stable storage is the responsibility of the
> writeback infrastructure, not the VMA/mm infrasrtucture. For non-dax
> configurations, msync defers all that to vfs_fsync_range(), because
> it has to be implemented there for fsync() to work.
>
> Even for DAX, msync has to call vfs_fsync_range() for the filesystem to commit
> the backing store allocations to stable storage, so there's not
> getting around the fact msync is the wrong place to be flushing
> DAX mappings to persistent storage.
DAX does call ->fsync before and after this patch. And with all
the recent fixes we take care to ensure data is written though the
cache for everything but mmap-access. With this patch from Ross
we ensure msync writes back the cache before calling ->fsync so that
the filesystem can then do it's work like converting unwritten extents.
The only downside is that previously on Linux you could always use
fsync as a replaement for msymc, which isn't true anymore for DAX.
But given that we need the virtual address to write back the cache
I can't see how to do this differently given that clwb() needs the
user virtual address to flush the cache.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists