linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/11] ocfs2: Less checks in ocfs2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55E556DF.9000301@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:42:23 +0200
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ocfs2: Less checks in ocfs2_rename() after error
 detection

>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 15:30:18 +0200
>>
>> Skip checks for a few variables in three error handling cases within
>> the ocfs2_rename() function by adjustment of a few jump targets
>> according to the Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> 
> I don't think this is an improvement.

How do you think about the other update suggestions from this patch series?

Would anybody like to contribute constructive comments so that further progress
can eventually be achieved for a corresponding source code review?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/