[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150901075811.GK4796@x1>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:58:11 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
hugues.fruchet@...com,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
valentinrothberg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] [media] c8sectpfe: Update binding to reset-gpios
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Peter Griffin
> <peter.griffin@...aro.org> wrote:
> > gpio.txt documents that GPIO properties should be named
> > "[<name>-]gpios", with <name> being the purpose of this
> > GPIO for the device.
> >
> > This change has been done as one atomic commit.
>
> dtb and kernel updates are not necessarily atomic, so you are breaking
> compatibility with older dtbs. You should certainly highlight that in
> the commit message.
Good idea.
> I only point this out. I'll leave it to platform
> maintainers whether or not this breakage is acceptable.
This driver is new. The 'original' bindings are in next. So this
binding is not even close to being ABI.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists