[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150901085432.GE6315@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:54:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/insn: perf tools: Add a few new x86 instructions
* Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> perf tools has a copy of the x86 instruction decoder for decoding
> Intel PT. [...]
So that's the arch/x86/lib/insn.c instruction length decoder that the kernel uses
for kprobes et al - and the two versions already forked slightly:
-#include "inat.h"
-#include "insn.h"
+#include <asm/inat.h>
+#include <asm/insn.h>
it would be nice to add a diff check to the perf build, and (non-fatally) warn
during the build if the two versions depart from each other?
This will make sure the two versions are fully in sync in the long run as well.
( Alternatively we could perhaps also librarize it into tools/lib/, and teach the
kernel build to pick that one up? )
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists