[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1441068591.4966.47.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:49:51 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@...escale.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Victoria Milhoan <vicki.milhoan@...escale.com>,
Steve Cornelius <steve.cornelius@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Alex Porosanu <alexandru.porosanu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] crypto: caam - handle core endianness != caam
endianness
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 14:50 +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
>
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> -#define wr_reg32(reg, data) out_be32(reg, data)
> -#define rd_reg32(reg) in_be32(reg)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_FSL_CAAM_LE
> +#define caam16_to_cpu(value) le16_to_cpu(value)
> +#define cpu_to_caam16(value) cpu_to_le16(value)
> +#define caam32_to_cpu(value) le32_to_cpu(value)
> +#define cpu_to_caam32(value) cpu_to_le32(value)
> +#define caam64_to_cpu(value) le64_to_cpu(value)
> +#define cpu_to_caam64(value) cpu_to_le64(value)
What if we want to build a kernel that supports a chip with an LE CAAM and
another chip with a BE CAAM (e.g. ls1043a plus ls2080a)? This information
needs to come at runtime.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D
Likewise, why is there an ifdef for a particular SoC type?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists