linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: don't make assumptions about length of string on task rename

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:07:32 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: don't make assumptions about length of string
 on task rename

On 08/28/2015 11:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:06:58 -0400
> Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
>> While the dest comm string size is assured to be at least TASK_COMM_LEN long,
>> doing a memcpy() also adds the assumption that the source is at least that
>> long as well, which isn't assured, and isn't true in cases such as:
>>
>> 	set_task_comm(worker->task, "kworker/dying");
>>
>> This leads to accessing invalid memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> Should this go to stable as well?

Yup.

> Also, as the memcpy was just faster than a strcpy, the static length
> was used. Perhaps we should convert that to a dynamic length string.
> But that should be a separate patch as this one fixes a possible bug,
> and the conversion to a dynamic string is just an enhancement.

That'll slow things down for the common case, no?


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/