[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509011801570.15006@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:05:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq updates for 4.3
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 09:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> > <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Marc Zyngier (23):
> > >        irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
> > 
> > This appears to lead to qemu arm boot tests silently failing (according
> > to Guenter).  This commit only appeared in next-20150831.
> > 
> 
> I think we really need more time between patches showing up in -next and
> being pushed upstream. We have several new failures in -next which were
> introduced after next-20150828, with this being the most serious one.
Sorry about that. I usally let stuff breed long enough in next, but I
made an exception on this one. I tested it on several ARM boards
myself and certainly did not expect that there are still non
devicetree (or ACPI) based systems utilizing the GIC out there. I
certainly did not think about qemu ...
Thanks,
	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists