[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150901184839.GA4524@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:48:39 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Always use non inlined file name for srcfile
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:36:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:42AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > When profiling the kernel with srcfile it's common to "get
> > stuck" in include. For example a lot of code uses current
> > or other inlines, so they get accounted to some random
> > include file. This is not very useful as a high level
> > categorization.
>
> Cool idea :-)
Yes.
It would be also nice to use this information for unwinding
(so to show the inline stack as part of the call graph)
> Why not the so much simpler:
>
> while (bfd_find_inliner_info(...));
>
> But other than that, wouldn't be better to put an upper limit on this?
>
> Say, 1024 levels of unwinding to avoid tripping in some bfd lib bug that
> could make this function always return true and make addr2line get stuck
> in an infinite loop?
Done. I sent a v2.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists