[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509012125310.15006@nanos>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 21:26:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@...com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/mm/srat: Print non-volatile flag in SRAT
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 9/1/2015 3:17 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Linda Knippers wrote:
> >> Nobody checks this flag but it would be interesting to know if it's being
> >> set on any platforms.
> >
> > What you're omitting to explain, is WHY it would be interesting.
>
> With the addition of NVDIMM support, a question came up as to whether
> NVDIMM ranges should be in the SRAT with this bit set. I think the
> consensus was no because the ranges are in the NFIT with proximity
> domain information there.
>
> ACPI is not clear on the meaning of this bit in the SRAT.
> If someone is setting it, we might want to ask them what they expect
> to happen with it.
>
> Right now this bit is only printed if all the ACPI debug information is
> turned on.
>
> Sorry, I should have explained more.
Indeed. And that explanation wants to be in the changelog. Care to resend?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists