linux-kernel - Re: Regression: can't apply frequency offsets above 1000ppm.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLVmSV1ROQGrwLOATqgwhUOM8e38f6go1-y4qGE5Q_6GDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:28:07 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Nuno Gonçalves <nunojpg@...il.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, dl4mea@...oo.de
Subject: Re: Regression: can't apply frequency offsets above 1000ppm.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Nuno Gonçalves <nunojpg@...il.com> wrote:
> There is a regression on the clock system since v3.16-rc5-111-g4396e05
> [1], where the clock doesn't apply frequency offsets above about
> 1000ppm [2].

??? Hrm. I'm not sure I'm understanding here.

Adjtimex frequency limits have been capped to ~500ppm for a long time
and the commit you pointed to in [1] doesn't seem to be at all related
to the adjtimex interface.

Can you be more specific about which interface and arguments you're
using which are causing troubles?
Miroslav: Do you have further details?

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/