[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2671167.vEAaCPQzyJ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 01:58:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: zhaoyang.huang@...aro.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:SUSPEND TO RAM" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/power/wakeirq: Call device_init_wakeup from dev_pm_set_wake_irq
On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 04:53:37 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The function dev_pm_set_wake_irq is typically called after device_init_wakeup.
>
> Instead of summing a couple of call, let's call device_init_wakeup directly
> from dev_pm_set_wake_irq / dev_pm_clear_wake_irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
If there are any existing callers of dev_pm_attach_wake_irq(), you need to
update them too I think. Also, what if someone wants to use
device_set_wakeup_capable() rather than device_init_wakeup()?
> ---
> drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> index eb6e674..287a021 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ static int dev_pm_attach_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq,
> *
> * Attach a device IO interrupt as a wake IRQ. The wake IRQ gets
> * automatically configured for wake-up from suspend based
> - * on the device specific sysfs wakeup entry. Typically called
> - * during driver probe after calling device_init_wakeup().
> + * on the device specific sysfs wakeup entry.
> */
> int dev_pm_set_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> {
> @@ -75,9 +74,13 @@ int dev_pm_set_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> wirq->dev = dev;
> wirq->irq = irq;
>
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> +
> err = dev_pm_attach_wake_irq(dev, irq, wirq);
> - if (err)
> + if (!err) {
> kfree(wirq);
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> + }
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -102,6 +105,7 @@ void dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(struct device *dev)
> if (!wirq)
> return;
>
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
> device_wakeup_detach_irq(dev);
> dev->power.wakeirq = NULL;
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists