[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB1550752EBCD1B8DECF06483A9B690@SN1PR0301MB1550.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 02:10:18 +0000
From: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@...escale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"lauraa@...eaurora.org" <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@...escale.com>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Li Leo <LeoLi@...escale.com>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with
bytes-alignment to genalloc
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:38AM +0800, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:30 AM
> To: Zhao Qiang-B45475
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org;
> lauraa@...eaurora.org; Xie Xiaobo-R63061; benh@...nel.crashing.org; Li
> Yang-Leo-R58472; paulus@...ba.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with
> bytes-alignment to genalloc
>
> On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:58 +0800, Zhao Qiang wrote:
> > Bytes alignment is required to manage some special RAM, so add
> > gen_pool_first_fit_align to genalloc, meanwhile add
> > gen_pool_alloc_data to pass data to gen_pool_first_fit_align(modify
> > gen_pool_alloc as a wrapper)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@...escale.com>
> > ---
> > Changes for v6:
> > - patches set v6 include a new patch because of using
> > - genalloc to manage QE MURAM, patch 0001 is the new
> > - patch, adding bytes alignment for allocation for use.
> > Changes for v7:
> > - cpm muram also need to use genalloc to manage, it has
> > a function to reserve a specific region of muram,
> > add offset to genpool_data for start addr to be allocated.
>
> This seems to be describing more than just the changes in this patch.
> What does also handling cpm have to do with this patch? Are you adding
> support for reserving a specific region in this patch? I don't see it,
> and in any case it should go in a different patch.
Yes, I added. The code below can support the function.
offset_bit = (alignment->offset + (1UL << order) - 1) >> order;
return bitmap_find_next_zero_area(map, size, start + offset_bit, nr,
align_mask);
CPM has an function cpm_muram_alloc_fixed, needing to allocate muram from a
Specific offset. So I add the code and add offset to struct data.
This patch is the first patch of this patch set, so I explain what changes about
Set v7 and why I add support for reserving a specific region in this patch.
If you really think a different patch needed, I can add a new patch to handle it.
>
> > +/*
> > + * gen_pool data descriptor for gen_pool_first_fit_align.
> > + */
> > +struct genpool_data_align {
> > + int align; /* alignment by bytes for starting
> address */
> > + unsigned long offset; /* the offset of allocation start addr*/
> > +};
>
> The offset belongs on the caller side, not here.
So, how do I pass offset to gen_pool_alloc_data or pool->algo?
>
> -Scott
Powered by blists - more mailing lists