[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150902073942.GA6002@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:39:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: 'Jiri Olsa' <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/insn: perf tools: Add a few new x86 instructions
* 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> > sure, np you can use my ack
>
> I'm also OK for this patch. I just concern that is OK for Adrian too?
> Since this ensures all the copied code should be dead copy (not modified anymore),
> if we want a different instruction decoding routine, we have to break the test
> anyway.
So the idea would be to not break anything, only warn in a non-fatal question.
This protects against unbisectable universes being created via simple git merges
where updates meet but testing of tooling isn't done.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists