linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C57DF728-E46C-433C-AA9D-209557D795E2@filmlight.ltd.uk>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:45:29 +0100
From:	Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ben Myers <bpm@....com>,
	David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree


On 2 Sep 2015, at 03:16, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Jens,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>  c9eb256eda44 ("xfs: return errors from partial I/O failures to files")
> 
> from the xfs tree and commit:
> 
>  4246a0b63bd8 ("block: add a bi_error field to struct bio")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index c8637073ef25,c77499bcbd7a..000000000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@@ -354,8 -355,7 +353,8 @@@ xfs_end_bio
>  {
>  	xfs_ioend_t		*ioend = bio->bi_private;
> 
> - 	if (!ioend->io_error && !test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
> - 		ioend->io_error = error;
> -	ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error;
> ++	if (!ioend->io_error)
> ++		ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error;
> 
>  	/* Toss bio and pass work off to an xfsdatad thread */
>  	bio->bi_private = NULL;
> 
> 

This is incorrect; it can clear an earlier error status. It should probably read:

 	if (!ioend->io_error && bio->bi_error)
 		ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error;

—
Roger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/