[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E6CB39.5000305@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:11:05 +0100
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
KVM devel mailing list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] arm64: 16K translation granule support
On 02/09/15 10:55, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 August 2015 at 13:33, Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com> wrote:
>> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>>
>> Patches 1-7 cleans up the kernel page size handling code.
>> Patches 8-11 Fixes some issues with the KVM bits, mainly the fake PGD
>> handling code.
>> Patch 12 Adds a check to ensure the CPU supports the selected granule size.
>> Patch 13-14 Adds the 16k page size support bits.
>>
>> This series applies on top of for-next/core branch of the aarch64 tree and is
>> also available here:
>>
>> git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git 16k/v1
>>
>
>
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> I have given this a spin on the FVP Base model to check UEFI booting,
> and everything seems to work fine. (I tested 2-level and 3-level)
> I didn't test the KVM changes, so for all patches except those:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Thanks for the review and testing !!
Suzuki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists