[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1441200891.17400.1277.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:34:51 +0100
From: Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 23:03 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:45:29 +0100 Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On 2 Sep 2015, at 03:16, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > ++ if (!ioend->io_error)
> > > ++ ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error;
> >
> > This is incorrect; it can clear an earlier error status. It should probably read:
> >
> > if (!ioend->io_error && bio->bi_error)
> > ioend->io_error = bio->bi_error;
>
> Thanks, I will use that from tomorrow.
>
Huh, now I've had my coffee, that extra check doesn't add anything.
(There's no harm done in assigning zero to io_error if it's already
zero.) Apologies for the noise.
--
Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists