[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA4JGZYGcod0HLg-0Y2JsKbqOKr4KJcgy76uejAPr1gAAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:25:51 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems)" <ajb@...eresystems.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: stop breaking dosemu (Re: x86/kconfig/32: Rename CONFIG_VM86 and
default it to 'n')
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>> I'd be amenable to switching the default back to y and perhaps adding
>>> a sysctl to make the distros more comfortable. Ingo, Kees, Brian,
>>> what do you think?
>>
>> Can you please leave the default as N, and have a sysctl option to
>> enable it instead? While dosemu might still be in use, it isn't going
>> to be the common case at all. So from a distro perspective, I think
>> we'd probably rather have the default match the common case.
>
> Linus will say the default must not break existing userspace...
Yeah, I guess. Which is weird when it's already N in his tree and
we're talking about a config option that is explicitly there to
disable things. Something will be broken if it's toggled, but oh
well.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists