[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150902230804.GX19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 01:08:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf: bug, kernel ignores the buffer size on large read
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:34:41PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> OK, this time I found the actual bug.
>
> event->read_size is declared as a u16 in include/linux/perf_event.h
>
> but it is very easy to get event->read_size larger than 64k
> (in my case, create 10000 events in a group).
>
> Because we wrap around the u16, the
> if (count < event->read_size) return -ENOSPC;
> in perf_read_hw() doesn't trigger reliably and so if you do a read
> on a large group event the kernel will quite happily copy_to_user()
> beyond the bounds of the value set in the read syscall.
>
> In my case it completely smashed the stack and caused the program to
> segfault.
>
> I'm not sure what the solution is here. Change read_size to be larger?
> Ban events whose read size would be larger than 64k? Although that gets
> tricky because the related header_size is also only a u16.
I think we should try and just ban events with a read_size > 64k; that's
one _large_ group -- there's other issues with that as well I imagine.
If we really want to allow something larger, we _could_ fudge something
for cases where we do not have PERF_SAMPLE_READ set, but that's not
particularly nice either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists