[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150903080028.GS21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:00:28 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than
0xf0000000
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:24:47AM +0900, Yongtaek Lee wrote:
> default value of vmalloc_min was set 0xf0000000 for ARM by commit
> 0536bdf3. But actually vmalloc_min is 0xef800000 not 0xf0000000.
>
> VMALLOC_END - (240 << 20) - VMALLOC_OFFSET)
> 0xff000000 - 0x0f000000 - 0x00800000 = 0xef800000
>
> In case of 768MB ram without CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y, last 8MB could not be
> allocated. Kernel log also print out warning message as below.
> "Truncating RAM at 80000000-afffffff to -af7fffff (vmalloc region overlap)."
>
> Although it could be solved by state "vmalloc=size" in cmdline but i think
> it would be better to change default value to 232 from 240.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@...sung.com>
I fail to see what the problem is here. You're adjusting the size of the
vmalloc space to accomodate the size of RAM you have. That's not a bug.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists