linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:28:38 -0300
From:	Albino B Neto <bino@...eup.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes

2015-09-02 20:47 GMT-03:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>> Yes, that would be a bug.
>
> So the thing I'm happy to see is that the ext4 developers seem to
> unanimously agree that maintaining ext3 compatibility is part of their
> job, and nobody seems to be arguing for keeping ext3 around. As long
> as any possible regressions from ext3 removal have a clear "yup, it's
> on us" from the ext4 people,  I don't mind removing it. I was
> expecting ext4 people to not be thrilled about supporting possible
> legacy cases.

Good.

The future of ext4 ? Are you (developers) write other file system ?

-- 
Albino B Neto
www.bino.us
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/