[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150903130956.GA17380@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:09:56 -0500
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers/misc/sgi-gru: remove unused variable
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:10:12AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:54:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > These variables were only assigned some value and were never used.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> <snip>
> > > + int i;
> > +
> > + if ((GRU_NUM_TFM * GRU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES) > (ubufend - ubuf))
> > + return -EFBIG;
> Just a minor (or major) doubt.
> The function returns GRU_NUM_TFM * GRU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES and the for loop
> is also running till GRU_NUM_TFM so I am assuming that the function can
> handle buffer till size of GRU_NUM_TFM * GRU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES. So the
> error -EFBIG should occur when the buffer is more than this. Then
> shouldn't it be:
> if ((GRU_NUM_TFM * GRU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES) < (ubufend - ubuf))
> return -EFBIG;
>
> or i am wrong in interpreting it?
>
The likely intent was to return an error when the buffer isn't big enough
to hold GRU_NUM_TFM * GRU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists