[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E854CB.5080900@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:10:19 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<balbi@...com>
CC: <tony@...mide.com>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
<peter.chen@...escale.com>, <jun.li@...escale.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] usb: dwc3: core: don't break during suspend/resume
while we're dual-role
On 03/09/15 17:05, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/03/2015 05:01 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>>>> We can't rely just on dr_mode to decide if we're in host or gadget
>>>> mode when we're configured as otg/dual-role. So while dr_mode is
>>>> OTG, we find out from the otg state machine if we're in host
>>>> or gadget mode and take the necessary actions during suspend/resume.
>>>>
>>>> Also make sure that we disable OTG irq and events during system suspend
>>>> so that we don't lockup the system during system suspend/resume.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> index 654aebf..25891e3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> @@ -1455,18 +1455,15 @@ static int dwc3_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> dwc->octl = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_OCTL);
>>>> dwc->oevt = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_OEVT);
>>>> dwc->oevten = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_OEVTEN);
>>>> + dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_OEVTEN, 0);
>>>> + disable_irq(dwc->otg_irq);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - switch (dwc->dr_mode) {
>>>> - case USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL:
>>>> - case USB_DR_MODE_OTG:
>>>> + if (dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL ||
>>>> + ((dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_OTG) && (dwc->fsm->protocol == PROTO_GADGET)))
>>>
>>> Hm, you're not very consistent about your parens. :-)
>>
>> You're right. Should be
>>
>> if ((dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL) ||
>> ((dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_OTG) && (dwc->fsm->protocol == PROTO_GADGET)))
>
> Parens around == are useless, I'd prefer if you deleted them. But if you'd like to keep them, let it be so. :-)
OK, how about this then?
if (dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL ||
(dwc->dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_OTG && dwc->fsm->protocol == PROTO_GADGET))
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists