[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2B3535C5ECE8B5419E3ECBE30077290901DC354016@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 01:12:07 +0000
From: John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] usb: dwc2: refactor common low-level hw code to
platform.c
On 8/21/2015 5:39 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> DWC2 module on some platforms needs three additional hardware
> resources: phy controller, clock and power supply. All of them must be
> enabled/activated to properly initialize and operate. This was initially
> handled in s3c-hsotg driver, which has been converted to 'gadget' part
> of dwc2 driver. Unfortunately, not all of this code got moved to common
> platform code, what resulted in accessing DWC2 registers without
> enabling low-level hardware resources. This fails for example on Exynos
> SoCs. This patch moves all the code for managing those resources to
> common platform.c file and provides convenient wrappers for controlling
> them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 4 +-
> drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 188 +++++-----------------------------------
> drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 204 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index 0ed87620941b..ec820bdf98c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ struct dwc2_hsotg {
> enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode;
> unsigned int hcd_enabled:1;
> unsigned int gadget_enabled:1;
> + unsigned int ll_hw_enabled:1;
It seems like this flag is used to restore the state of the
lowlevel_hw on suspend/resume?
I think it is clearer to put the setting/clearing of the flag
inside the ll_hw_enable/disable and then check and adjust on
suspend/resume. That way you don't have to manage this flag
everywhere you call enable/disable().
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists