[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150903151854.GA21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:54 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexandru Stan <amstan@...omium.org>, briannorris@...omium.org,
Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>,
姚智情 <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add ddc i2c reference to veyron
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we would not
> describe an I2C bus in DT in that case. Same with HPD directly handled
> vs. a GPIO line. That is no different than what Doug has said:
> ddc-i2c-bus is present if using the SOC's I2C host and absent if using
> the HDMI block's DDC functionality. I'm only questioning the location
> of the property.
No, I don't think that's what Doug wants. Doug wants the bridge's
internal I2C host to be exposed, so he can number it through a DT
alias.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists