linux-kernel - [RFC/PATCH 1/3] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1441301337-18954-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri,  4 Sep 2015 02:28:55 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events()

The add_perf_probe_events() does 3 things:

 1. convert all perf events to trace events
 2. add all trace events to kernel
 3. cleanup all trace events

But sometimes we need to do something with the trace events.  So split
the funtion into two, so that it can access intermediate trace events
via struct __event_package if needed.

Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index eb5f18b75402..8eaa03428d72 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -2765,9 +2765,10 @@ struct __event_package {
 	int				ntevs;
 };
 
-int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
+static int __add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
+				   struct __event_package **ppkgs)
 {
-	int i, j, ret;
+	int i, ret;
 	struct __event_package *pkgs;
 
 	ret = 0;
@@ -2792,7 +2793,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 		ret  = convert_to_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev,
 						     &pkgs[i].tevs);
 		if (ret < 0)
-			goto end;
+			return ret;
 		pkgs[i].ntevs = ret;
 	}
 	/* This just release blacklist only if allocated */
@@ -2806,7 +2807,19 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 	}
-end:
+
+	*ppkgs = pkgs;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void cleanup_perf_probe_events(struct __event_package *pkgs, int npevs)
+{
+	int i, j;
+
+	if (pkgs == NULL)
+		return;
+
 	/* Loop 3: cleanup and free trace events  */
 	for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < pkgs[i].ntevs; j++)
@@ -2815,6 +2828,15 @@ end:
 	}
 	free(pkgs);
 	exit_symbol_maps();
+}
+
+int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct __event_package *pkgs = NULL;
+
+	ret = __add_perf_probe_events(pevs, npevs, &pkgs);
+	cleanup_perf_probe_events(pkgs, npevs);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/