[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E8952E.4080603@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:45:02 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Andreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@....de>
Cc: linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
Subject: Re: parisc: adjust L1_CACHE_BYTES to 128 bytes on PA8800 and PA8900
CPUs
Hi Andreas,
On 03.09.2015 11:23, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> today's linux-next tree (next-20150903) contains commit 20f924902ff6
> ("parisc: adjust L1_CACHE_BYTES to 128 bytes on PA8800 and PA8900 CPUs")
> which you authored.
>
> I noticed it because we[0] are running a daily analysis on all commits
> in linux-next as part of our research and our tools reported it.
>
> In the patch, you create the following #if defined() structure in
> arch/parisc/include/asm/cache.h (lines 16 and following):
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PA8X00)
> ...
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PA20)
> ...
> #else
> ...
> #endif
>
> In Kconfig, CONFIG_PA20 is defined as the following
> (arch/parisc/Kconfig, line 163):
>
> config PA20
> def_bool y
> depends on PA8X00
>
> This means that CONFIG_PA20 can and will only be enabled if
> CONFIG_PA8X00 has already been enabled, which means that the contents of
> the "#elif defined(CONFIG_PA20)" block can never be reached: its
> condition is only evaluated if CONFIG_PA8X00 is disabled, but then
> CONFIG_PA20 can never be enabled either.
That's absolutely true.
I'll fix it with the next iteration of this patch.
Thanks,
Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists