[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E8DD00.2030706@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:51:28 -0700
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, yuyang.du@...el.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by
capacity_orig
Hi Morten, Dietmar,
On 08/14/2015 09:23 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
...
> + * cfs_rq.avg.util_avg is the sum of running time of runnable tasks plus the
> + * recent utilization of currently non-runnable tasks on a CPU. It represents
> + * the amount of utilization of a CPU in the range [0..capacity_orig] where
I see util_sum is scaled by SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT at the end of
__update_load_avg(). If there is now an assumption that util_avg may be
used directly as a capacity value, should it be changed to
SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT? These are equal right now, not sure if they will
always be or if they can be combined.
> + * capacity_orig is the cpu_capacity available at * the highest frequency
spurious *
thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists