lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:00:10 +0100 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com> To: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com> CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/cpufeature.h: Add macros for a cpu features testing On 03/09/15 19:11, Alexander Kuleshov wrote: > This patch provides a couple of macros for the testing of processor > features (crypto and FP/SIMD) like support of SHA1, AES instructions, > support for FPU and etc. There is already a couple of places in the > arch/arm64/kernel where these processor features are tested and these > macros are facilitate this. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > index c104421..2919455 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > @@ -28,7 +28,50 @@ > > #define ARM64_NCAPS 4 > > +/* > + * ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 AES, bits [7:4] > + */ > +#define ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_AES_MASK 4 > +#define ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_AES(feature) \ > + (((feature >> ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_AES_MASK) & 0xf) & 1UL) > +#define ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_PMULL(feature) \ > + (((feature >> ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_AES_MASK) & 0xf) & 2UL) > + There is generic CPUID feature helper queued for 4.3, which can extract the feature bits cpuid_feature_extract_field(feature, shift) You might want to use it instead. Btw, I have a patch series(waiting for the merge window, before I post), which changes the way we initialise the HWCAP bits. Thanks Suzuki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists