linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] KVM: dynamic halt_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP48C469210EC2FC5B0AB64F80570@phx.gbl>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:42:10 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
To:	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
CC:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] KVM: dynamic halt_poll_ns adjustment

On 9/4/15 9:16 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> [...]
>>> +
>>>   static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   {
>>>          if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
>>> @@ -1929,6 +1963,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>          ktime_t start, cur;
>>>          DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>>>          bool waited = false;
>>> +       u64 poll_ns = 0, wait_ns = 0, block_ns = 0;
>>>
>>>          start = cur = ktime_get();
>>>          if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) {
>>> @@ -1941,10 +1976,15 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>                           */
>>>                          if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0) {
>>> ++vcpu->stat.halt_successful_poll;
>>> -                               goto out;
>>> +                               break;
>>>                          }
>>>                          cur = ktime_get();
>>>                  } while (single_task_running() && ktime_before(cur, 
>>> stop));
>>> +
>>> +               if (ktime_before(cur, stop)) {
>> You can't use 'cur' to tell if the interrupt arrived. 
>> single_task_running()
>> can break us out of the loop before 'stop'.
>>
>>> +                       poll_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - 
>>> ktime_to_ns(start);
>> Put this line before the if(). block_ns should always include the time
>> spent polling; even if polling does not succeed.
>
> Ah, I remember why I keep poll_ns calculation in if(). Actually 
> poll_ns has already been accumulated into wait_ns(see how wait_ns is 
> calculated) if polling does not succeed. If put poll_ns calculation 
> before if() I need to reset variable 'start' to ktime_get().

So how about something like:

@@ -1928,7 +1962,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
         ktime_t start, cur;
         DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-       bool waited = false;
+       bool polled = false, waited = false;
+       u64 poll_ns = 0, wait_ns = 0, block_ns = 0;

         start = cur = ktime_get();
         if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) {
@@ -1940,11 +1975,17 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                          * arrives.
                          */
                         if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0) {
+                               polled = true;
++vcpu->stat.halt_successful_poll;
-                               goto out;
+                               break;
                         }
                         cur = ktime_get();
                 } while (single_task_running() && ktime_before(cur, stop));
+
+               if (polled) {
+                       poll_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
+                       goto out;
+               }
         }


Regards,
Wanpeng Li

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/