[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1441336073-22750-9-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:07:51 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [[PATCH v6 08/10] Define PERF_PMU_TXN_READ interface
Define a new PERF_PMU_TXN_READ interface to read a group of counters
at once.
pmu->start_txn() // Initialize before first event
for each event in group
pmu->read(event); // Queue each event to be read
rc = pmu->commit_txn() // Read/update all queued counters
Note that we use this interface with all PMUs. PMUs that implement this
interface use the ->read() operation to _queue_ the counters to be read
and use ->commit_txn() to actually read all the queued counters at once.
PMUs that don't implement PERF_PMU_TXN_READ ignore ->start_txn() and
->commit_txn() and continue to read counters one at a time.
Thanks to input from Peter Zijlstra.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog[v4]
- [Peter Zijlstra] Add lockdep_assert_held() in perf_event_read_group().
Make sure the entire transaction happens on the same CPU.
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 4e8d780..b3435e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ struct perf_event;
#define PERF_EVENT_TXN 0x1
#define PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD 0x1 /* txn to add/schedule event on PMU */
+#define PERF_PMU_TXN_READ 0x2 /* txn to read event group from PMU */
/**
* pmu::capabilities flags
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index acdd8b5..9335bce 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3199,6 +3199,7 @@ static void __perf_event_read(void *info)
struct perf_event *sub, *event = data->event;
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
+ struct pmu *pmu = event->pmu;
/*
* If this is a task context, we need to check whether it is
@@ -3217,18 +3218,31 @@ static void __perf_event_read(void *info)
}
update_event_times(event);
- if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
- event->pmu->read(event);
+ if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ goto unlock;
- if (!data->group)
+ if (!data->group) {
+ pmu->read(event);
+ data->ret = 0;
goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ pmu->start_txn(pmu, PERF_PMU_TXN_READ);
+
+ pmu->read(event);
list_for_each_entry(sub, &event->sibling_list, group_entry) {
update_event_times(sub);
- if (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+ if (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
+ /*
+ * Use sibling's PMU rather than @event's since
+ * sibling could be on different (eg: software) PMU.
+ */
sub->pmu->read(sub);
+ }
}
- data->ret = 0;
+
+ data->ret = pmu->commit_txn(pmu);
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists