linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/15] tools lib api: Add mount support for fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:57:00 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] tools lib api: Add mount support for fs

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:26:31 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:14:28AM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> > 2015-09-02 3:56 GMT-04:00 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>:
> > > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > > interface that tries to mount the filesystem in case no mount is found.
> > >
> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ja49vwfiq2qqkmoxx9yk26lm@git.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/lib/api/fs/fs.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  tools/lib/api/fs/fs.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Why automatic mounting the **fs filesystems?
> > Isn't it better to let the user decide when and where to mount it if
> > s/he forgot to do it before? Forcing a mount is also potentially
> > forcing to umount then mount when mounting has been forgotten before.
> 
> well, I guess at some point we decided this was a good idea
> to make perf more user friendly
> 
> AFAICS we do this only for debugfs and tracefs.. procfs
> and sysfs are mounted most of the time anyway 

Note, if sysfs isn't already mounted, than nothing will get mounted by
perf. As sysfs is a requirement to get to /sys/kernel/trace and debug.


> 
> we could track and unmount on exit, but I'd say let's have
> someone complaining about it first ;-)
> 

Agreed. Although, I use perf/trace-cmd to mount that directory for
me :-)

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/