[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150904154133.GI18489@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:41:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Hall, Christopher S" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Add correlated clocksource deriving system time
from an auxiliary clocksource
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:17:43PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I think what they're getting at is asking if there's a rate limit to
> > time adjustments, without that, saving the last n transition points will
> > still not cover any given length of history.
>
> As if the ntp code isn't complex enough already - now we're adding
> sample histories and adjustment rating limiting?
>
> And all for some unknown DSP in a mythical sound card??
Hehe, I'm just a 'translator' here. But going by you answer I'm taking
it there isn't in fact a rate-limit to adjustments. Which, even if you
were not opposed to that direction, makes it an unfeasible proposition.
Also, I'm not thinking its too mythical, sound/soc/intel/ is full of
audio DSP stuff, I think a newer version will just gain ART support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists