linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150904171247.GA1786@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:12:47 +0600
From:	Alexnader Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
To:	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
Cc:	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack

Hello Jungseok,

On 09-04-15, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> +config IRQ_STACK
> +	bool "Use separate kernel stack when handling interrupts"
> +	depends on ARM64_4K_PAGES
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you want to use separate kernel stack to handle both
> +	  hard and soft interrupts. As reduceing memory footprint regarding
> +	  kernel stack, it benefits low memory platforms.

s/reduceing/reducing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/