linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/15] tools lib api: Add configured support for fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 19:45:01 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Raphaël Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] tools lib api: Add configured support for fs

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:42:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:52:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:17:59AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:39:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > Em Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > > > Adding name__mount (where name is in sysfs,procfs,debugfs,tracefs)
> > > > 
> > > > The cut'n'paste error I mentioned was in the above line, BTW.
> > > > 
> > > > > > > interface that returns bool state of the filesystem mount:
> > > > > > >   true - mounted, false - not mounted
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well, why not take the opportunity and call it... name__mounted()?
> > > > > > "__configured()" is too vague...
> > > > > 
> > > > > I mirrored the debugfs/tracefs object interface
> > > > > we can have another patch changing that
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, agreed, will leave it as configured() and then we can change it.
> > > 
> > > What I have is at my tmp.perf/core branch, out for lunch.
> > 
> > I can see all of it in your's perf/core apart from:
> > 
> > Applying: tools lib api: Make tracing_path_strerror_open message generic
> > Applying: tools lib api: Replace debugfs/tracefs objects interface with fs.c
> > Applying: tools lib api: Remove debugfs, tracefs and findfs objects
> > Applying: perf tools: Switch to tracing_path interface on appropriate places
> > 
> > should I repost or do you plan to take it? I didn't get any comments on those
> 
> I'll get back to those, its just that the number of patches in my
> perf/core branch was getting too high, better flush it a bit, will
> continue.
> 
> If you can just make sure that a rebase on top of my perf/core goes
> well, that helps.

I updated my perf/tracing_path branch to your current perf/core
no conflicts..

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/