[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150904205145.GB3475@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:51:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.org,
scottwood@...escale.com, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
> >Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
> Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
> since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
> work.
> >I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
> >proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
> >just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
> >one series?
> The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
> tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
> Here is the link to that discussion :
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg86916.html
> If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
> together. Michael?
Michael?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists