[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP237F3D6EFE0CCEE884C904780570@phx.gbl>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 06:38:41 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] KVM: dynamic halt-polling
Hi Paolo,
On 9/3/15 10:07 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> [...]
> static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
> @@ -1928,7 +1962,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> ktime_t start, cur;
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> - bool waited = false;
> + bool polled = false, waited = false;
> + u64 poll_ns = 0, wait_ns = 0, block_ns = 0;
>
> start = cur = ktime_get();
> if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) {
> @@ -1940,11 +1975,16 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * arrives.
> */
> if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0) {
> + polled = true;
> ++vcpu->stat.halt_successful_poll;
> - goto out;
> + break;
> }
> cur = ktime_get();
> } while (single_task_running() && ktime_before(cur, stop));
> +
> + poll_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
> + if (polled)
> + goto out;
>
Please move poll_ns caculation under if() when you applied, as I
explained in reply to v6.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists