[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150905194755.GD6040@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:47:55 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Handle postive return codes in phy_connect
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 02:44:01PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:18:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:01:29PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> > > The function phy_connect_direct can possibly return a positive
> > > return code. Using ERR_PTR with a positive value can lead to
> > > deferencing of an invalid pointer.
> >
> > Is this the correct fix? Would it not be better to find where the
> > positive return code is from and fix that?
>
> I guess I can trace it back to find out where the positive return code
> is originating.
>
> Is phy_connect_direct always supposed to return valid -errno?
I would look at this from a different angle. A positive ERRNO is
probably a bug of some sort. So rather than papering over the cracks,
go find what the real issue is.
It might not be an ERRNO. E.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/3/534
fixed a bug where a positive value is returned which is not an
indication of an error.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists