[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150906092016.GA20381@dhcp-128-25.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 17:20:16 +0800
From: Minfei Huang <mhuang@...hat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: allow dumping traces without tracking trace
started cpus
On 09/04/15 at 12:45pm, Sasha Levin wrote:
> We don't init iter->started when dumping the ftrace buffer, and there's no
> real need to do so - so allow skipping that check if the iter doesn't have
> an initialized ->started cpumask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 6e79408..0dc647f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -2671,13 +2671,14 @@ static void test_cpu_buff_start(struct trace_iterator *iter)
> if (!(iter->iter_flags & TRACE_FILE_ANNOTATE))
> return;
>
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(iter->cpu, iter->started))
> + if (iter->started && cpumask_test_cpu(iter->cpu, iter->started))
> return;
Ftrace will initialize the variable iter->started in the function
trace_init_global_iter. Otherwise kernel will panic during calling the
function cpumask_test_cpu.
So it is safe to call the function cpumask_test_cpu without doing
checking.
Thanks
Minfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists