| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:23:25 +0200 From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 0/22] On-demand device probing Hello, I have a problem with the panel on my Tegra Chromebook taking longer than expected to be ready during boot (Stéphane Marchesin reported what is basically the same issue in [0]), and have looked into ordered probing as a better way of solving this than moving nodes around in the DT or playing with initcall levels and linking order. While reading the thread [1] that Alexander Holler started with his series to make probing order deterministic, it occurred to me that it should be possible to achieve the same by probing devices as they are referenced by other devices. This basically reuses the information that is already implicit in the probe() implementations, saving us from refactoring existing drivers or adding information to DTBs. During review of v1 of this series Linus Walleij suggested that it should be the device driver core to make sure that dependencies are ready before probing a device. I gave this idea a try [2] but Mark Brown pointed out to the logic duplication between the resource acquisition and dependency discovery code paths (though I think it's fairly minor). To address that code duplication I experimented with Arnd's devm_probe [3] concept of having drivers declare their dependencies instead of acquiring them during probe, and while it worked [4], I don't think we end up winning anything when compared to just probing devices on-demand from resource getters. One remaining objection is to the "sprinkling" of calls to of_device_probe() in the resource getters of each subsystem, but I think it's the right thing to do given that the storage of resources is currently subsystem-specific. We could avoid the above by moving resource storage into the core, but I don't think there's a compelling case for that. I have tested this on boards with Tegra, iMX.6, Exynos, Rockchip and OMAP SoCs, and these patches were enough to eliminate all the deferred probes (except one in PandaBoard because omap_dma_system doesn't have a firmware node as of yet). Have submitted a branch [5] with only these patches on top of thursday's linux-next to kernelci.org and I don't see any issues that could be caused by them. For some reason it currently has more passes than the version of -next it's based on! With this series I get the kernel to output to the panel in 0.5s, instead of 2.8s. Regards, Tomeu [0] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-August/066527.html [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/12/452 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/17/305 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/277689 [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/21/441a [5] https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=on-demand-probes-v6 [6] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/collabora/kernel/v4.2-11902-g25d80c927f8b/ [7] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20150903/ Changes in v4: - Added bus.pre_probe callback so the probes of Primecell devices can be deferred if their device IDs cannot be yet read because of the clock driver not having probed when they are registered. Maybe this goes overboard and the matching information should be in the DT if there is one. - Rename of_platform_probe to of_device_probe - Use device_node.device instead of device_node.platform_dev - Take a reference to the regulator's device to prevent dangling pointers - Add Kconfig DELAY_DEVICE_PROBES to allow disabling delayed probing in machines with initcalls that depend on devices probing at a given time. - Start processing deferred probes in device_initcall_sync - Also defer probes of AMBA devices registered from the DT as they can also request resources. Changes in v3: - Set and use device_node.platform_dev instead of reversing the logic to find the platform device that encloses a device node. - Drop the fwnode API to probe firmware nodes and add OF-only API for now. I think this same scheme could be used for machines with ACPI, but I haven't been able to find one that had to defer its probes because of the device probe order. - Avoid unlocking the regulator device's mutex if we don't have a device Changes in v2: - Acquire regulator device lock before returning from regulator_dev_lookup() Tomeu Vizoso (22): driver core: Add pre_probe callback to bus_type ARM: amba: Move reading of periphid to pre_probe() of/platform: Point to struct device from device node of: add function to allow probing a device from a OF node gpio: Probe GPIO drivers on demand gpio: Probe pinctrl devices on demand regulator: core: Reduce critical area in _regulator_get regulator: core: Probe regulators on demand drm: Probe panels on demand drm/tegra: Probe dpaux devices on demand i2c: core: Probe i2c adapters and devices on demand pwm: Probe PWM chip devices on demand backlight: Probe backlight devices on demand usb: phy: Probe phy devices on demand clk: Probe clk providers on demand pinctrl: Probe pinctrl devices on demand phy: core: Probe phy providers on demand dma: of: Probe DMA controllers on demand power-supply: Probe power supplies on demand driver core: Allow deferring probes until late init driver core: Start processing deferred probes earlier of/platform: Defer probes of registered devices drivers/amba/bus.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/base/Kconfig | 18 +++++++++ drivers/base/dd.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++- drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 ++ drivers/dma/of-dma.c | 3 ++ drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 5 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 3 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c | 3 ++ drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 ++ drivers/of/device.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/platform.c | 26 +++++++------ drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 3 ++ drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c | 3 ++ drivers/power/power_supply_core.c | 3 ++ drivers/pwm/core.c | 3 ++ drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/usb/phy/phy.c | 3 ++ drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 3 ++ include/linux/device.h | 6 +++ include/linux/of.h | 1 + include/linux/of_device.h | 3 ++ 21 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) -- 2.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists