[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150907122419.GT11834@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:24:20 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
Cc: clm@...com, jbacik@...com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: memset cur_trans->delayed_refs to zero
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:25:27PM +0000, Alexandru Moise wrote:
> Use memset() to null out the btrfs_delayed_ref_root of
> btrfs_transaction instead of setting all the members to 0 by hand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> index 8f259b3..faccc1b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
> @@ -224,15 +224,7 @@ loop:
> cur_trans->start_time = get_seconds();
> cur_trans->dirty_bg_run = 0;
>
> - cur_trans->delayed_refs.href_root = RB_ROOT;
> - cur_trans->delayed_refs.dirty_extent_root = RB_ROOT;
> - atomic_set(&cur_trans->delayed_refs.num_entries, 0);
Please keep these. Even if it means duplicated setting to 0, it's using
the correct constructor, should it ever change (RB_ROOT) or does some
extra work (atomic_set).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists