[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150907174914.GA2148@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 19:49:14 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/14] ring_buffer: Fix more races when terminating
the producer in the benchmark
Sorry, I didn't read these emails, and I never looked at this code...
Can't understand what are you talking about but a minor nit anyway ;)
On 09/04, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> if (!kthread_should_stop())
> wait_to_die();
I bet this wait_to_die() can die, consumer/producer can simply exit.
Just you need get_task_struct() after kthread_create(), and put_task_struct()
after kthread_stop().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists