lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:42:05 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Use (two) different compilers at build-time?

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> So, how do I do that conveniently?

For a single file? Just compile everything with the primary compiler,
and then delete the single object file, and do "make" again.

Use a wrapper around the compiler (and point to that wrapper with the
"to switch compilers from under the make, without the build paths
changing (because otherwise our makefile auto-machinery notices that
flags and command changed).

Use CC (or CROSS_COMPILE) to point at your wrapper.

What we've occasionally wanted to do for compiler bugs is to have
something that can do the above not for single files, but some kind of
file bisection thing (so bisect not in history, but in the list of
files compiled). Sadly I don't think anybody has ever made that work.

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ