linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55EE3DCB.40401@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:45:47 +0900
From:	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To:	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Mailing List" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts.

Jungseok,

On 09/08/2015 01:34 AM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:06 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 07/09/15 16:48, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>>> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:36 PM, James Morse wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>>> Having to handle interrupts on top of an existing kernel stack means the
>>>> kernel stack must be large enough to accomodate both the maximum kernel
>>>> usage, and the maximum irq handler usage. Switching to a different stack
>>>> when processing irqs allows us to make the stack size smaller.
>>>>
>>>> Maximum kernel stack usage (running ltp and generating usb+ethernet
>>>> interrupts) was 7256 bytes. With this patch, the same workload gives
>>>> a maximum stack usage of 5816 bytes.
>>>
>>> I'd like to know how to measure the max stack depth.
>>> AFAIK, a stack tracer on ftrace does not work well. Did you dump a stack
>>> region and find or track down an untouched region?
>>
>> I enabled the 'Trace max stack' option under menuconfig 'Kernel Hacking' ->
>> 'Tracers', then looked in debugfs:/tracing/stack_max_size.
>>
>> What problems did you encounter?
>> (I may be missing something…)
>
> When I enabled the feature, all entries had *0* size except the last entry.
> It can be reproduced easily as looking in debugs:/tracing/stack_trace.

I'm afraid that you have not applied one of patches in my RFC:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355919.html

I have not looked into James' patch in details, but hope that it will help
fix one of issues that are annoying me: Stack tracer (actually save_stack_trace())
will miss a function (and its parent function in some case) that is being executed
when an interrupt is taken.


-Takahiro AKASHI

> You can track down my report and Akashi's changes with the following links:
> - http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354126.html
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/13/29
>
> Although it is impossible to measure an exact depth at this moment, the feature
> could be utilized to check improvement.
>
> Cc'ing Akashi for additional comments if needed.
>
> Best Regards
> Jungseok Lee
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/