linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: DT binding for Class D audio amplifier driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55EEAC0D.7010003@atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:36:13 +0800
From:	"Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@...el.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
	<tiwai@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: DT binding for Class D audio
 amplifier driver



On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 05:44:30PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
>> On 9/3/2015 19:43, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Why is this a separate DT node?  It seems that this IP is entirely self
>>> contained so I'm not clear why we need a separate node for the card, the
>>> card is usually a separate node because it ties together multiple
>>> different devices in the system but that's not the case here.
>
>> The classD can finish the audio function without other devices.
>> But I want to reuse the code in ASoC, leave many things(like creating PCM,
>> DMA operations) to ASoC, then the driver can only focus on how to configure
>> classD.
>> The classD IP is divided to tree parts logically, platform, CPU dai,
>> and codec, and these parts are registered to ASoC.
>
>> This separate DT node is needed in ASoC, ties these tree parts in ClassD.
>
> Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
> should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
> in DT.  It should be possible to register the card at the same time as
> the rest of the components rather than needing the separate device in
> the DT.
>
Do you mean using a single entry in the DT for the whole classD system 
and instantiate ASoC components from it.
For now, there are two entry, they could be combined to one entry.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/